OEL Technical Working Group

contribute your voice and help shape legislated ohs hygiene limits

Alberta Jobs, Economy, Trade and Immigration (JETI) is initiating a review of Occupational Exposure Limits (OEL) in accordance with its published 2025/26 OHS Code review schedule. This review includes an OEL Technical Working Group (OEL TWG) that makes OEL recommendations for government consideration before the Government publicly consults on changes under consideration, and amends the OEL listed in Schedule 1, Table 2 of the Alberta OHS Code.

AMHSA has been invited to participate in the GoA OEL TWG but needs your timely input to ensure that our participation accurately reflects your views, including impact on the municipal sector, technical and economic factors, and rationale for proposing that an Alberta OEL be different from the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) Threshold Limit Value (TLV).

municipal relevance

The majority of OELs in the current OHS Code are based on 2006 American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) Threshold Limit Values (TLV) and in absence of specific recommendations provided by impacted employers and industry associations - the government’s plan in principle is to adopt 2024 ACGIH TLVs for 31 substances that, in many instances, reflect OEL reductions of 80% or greater. 

call to action

AMHSA will be participating in GoA OEL TWG meetings approx. every 2-weeks until the end of 2025. We need your input to support meeting agenda actions and Terms of Reference requirements of the OEL TWG.  

If you would like to add your voice to impacts of changes to OELs (technical, economic, etc.) on the municipal sector, rationale for proposing that an Alberta OEL be different from ACGIH TLV please contact Edward Morgan (AMHSA Health and Safety Specialist). Anticipated municipal audiences are thought to include (but are not limited to) those who have: 

  • Organizational accountability for OEL compliance in your organization 
  • Role responsibility for supporting OEL compliance (OHS Specialist, Manager, etc.) 
  • Subject matter expertise in occupational hygiene (Hygienist, Hygiene Technologist, etc.) 
  • Operational knowledge related to priority substances scheduled for reduction 

activity timelines

Activity Role Timeline
TWG meeting participation to conduct review of short-listed OELs and other topics, as identified by the TWG.   AMHSA/TWG  Sept-Dec 2025 
Municipal interested parties engage with AMHSA in between TWG meetings to support accurate advocacy and representation of municipal impacts before JETI public consultation.  Municipal 
TWG provides recommendations/rationale to JETI on OELs  AMHSA/TWG  Jan 2026 
JETI to review and finalize recommendations for proposed changes and rationale on adoption of OELs  JETI  Jan 2026 


AMHSA appreciates the very short timelines associated for input and has voiced at the OEL TWG challenges of performing adequate consultation with municipal audiences between meetings to ensure that AMHSA’s views are reflective of potential industry and operational impacts. 

what’s asked of the technical working group?

In principle, the GoA plan is to adopt the 2024 ACGIH TLVs, absent of specific recommendations provided by impacted employers and industry associations. AMHSA’s attendance at the GoA OEL TWG will provide membership an opportunity to express their thoughts and provide recommendations on six topic items: 

  • Topic 1 – General approach to adopting ACGIH TLVs, 
  • Topic 2 – Airborne Particulates (Do we agree with ACGIH’s approach to size selective notations (for inhalable, thoracic and respirable) e.g. Carpentry or other Workshops. 
  • Topic 3 – Do we adopt ACGIH’s new inclusion of “Surface Limit (SL) OELs” (e.g. similar to surface sampling used in public-health). 
  • Topic 4 – OEL notations (e.g. going beyond carcinogen notations and adopting new ones such as sensitizers and eliminating Alberta centric “3” notation). 
  • Topic 5 – Substance-specific review (GoA proposes that the OEL TWG review 31 substance changes that can have a direct impact on Alberta Industries). Note: see notable substances, their significant OEL changes and AMHSA-related operations in table 1 below.  
  • Topic 6 – Chloramines e.g. in respect to worksite air quality concerns at indoor swimming pools.  Note: Do we establish our own as they are absent in the ACGHI TLVs.

Interested in providing input on behalf of your municipality? 

To share your municipalities views for AMHSA to voice with the OEL TWG, please reach out to Edward Morgan.

coming soon!

A secure new “Municipal OEL Employer Consultation” channel will be added to the existing AMHSA Forum platform for identified member municipal hygienists to provide input to AMHSA.  Details to share in our next newsletter. 

table 1: examples of potential interest to our members

Notable Substances Significant TLV Changes & Notes Related Operations
Chlorine/Chlorine dioxide
  • 80% (5 times lower), from 0.5 to 0.1 ppm 
Aquatic/Recreational Facilities 
Chromium, metal and inorganic compounds  
  • All the chromium and inorganic compounds related to chromium [put] together.  
  • The addition of a Shift OEL from nonexistent to 0.003 (I) mg/m3 
  • More descriptive “substance interaction” from No. “3” to health/safety notation [irritant] “DSEN” (dermal); “RSEN” (respiratory) 
Fabrication Facilities/Trades 
Fleet/Vehicle Repair  
Water Treatment Facilities 
Water-soluble CR VI Compounds 
  • 99.6 % change (250 times lower) From 0.05 mg/m3  to proposed 0.0002 mg/m3 
Water Treatment Facilities 
Ethylene glycol 
  • From non-existent 8-hour OEL to proposed 25 mg/m3 TLV 
Facilities/Building Maintenance 
Municipal Airports 
Nitrogen dioxide
  • 93% change (15 times lower), from 3ppm to 0.2 ppm
  • OSHA and NIOSH limits (5 ppm ceiling and 1 ppm REL respectively) are still higher than ACGIH’s updated TLV, which could create discrepancies in enforcement unless harmonized. 
Facilities (i.e. Transport/Fleet that have Mechanical/ Vehicle Repair such as Bus Barns/idling vehicles) 
Particulate Not Otherwise Regulated – Total   *From nonexistent to 10 mg/m3 
  • The 2014 TWG recommendation was to not adopt the size notation, but comments did not specify which size particulate fraction this is for.  
  • However, based on the information, it could be related to the change from total size fraction to inhalable size fraction. 
Facility and Road Construction (i.e. street sweeping, road construction) 
Ozone
  • Proposed TLV-TWA adopted in the 1990s. 
  • 2014 TWG had indicated that we do not adopt these values as the average natural airborne levels in Alberta can approach 0.05 ppm. Interpretation of different work rates for TLV may be inconsistent.  
  • No OEL chosen due to background levels in AB, Thus, 0.1 TLV and 0.6 STEL not included in Code 
Water Treatment Facilities 
Wood Dust Total  
  • A1 - Oak, beech carcinogen to  
Carpentry and other workshops 
Wood Dust (Total) Softwoods and hardwoods except western red cedar  
  • A2 – Birch, Mahogany, teak, walnut 
  • Western red cedar 0.5 mg/m3;  
  • Hardwood (oak, beech, birch, mahogany, teak, walnut) 1 mg/m3 (Total);  
  • Other wood species 5 mg/m3 (Total) 
  • Appears to be a good basis for a 1 mg/m3 limit for hard woods 
  • 5 mg/m3 appears to be protective for soft wood species
  • There are issues around the measurement of exposure with inhalable samplers; total samplers appear to measure closer to the inhalable convention. 
Carpentry and other workshops